MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808758339 · doi:10.4000/ideas.2553

Opera in the Arctic: Knud Rasmussen, Inside and Outside Modernity

2018· article· en· W2808758339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIdeAs · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernityOperaArcticThe arcticArtHistoryPhilosophyArt historyOceanographyEpistemologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines how modernity is inscribed in Inuit culture, specifically in Igloolik in 1922, and how it is represented within different temporalities: Knud Rasmussen’s account of his time among the Iglulingmiurt, Across Arctic America (1927), and Zacharias Kunuk and Norman Cohn’s Inuit film, The Journals of Knud Rasmussen (2006), which revisits that historical moment via a critical appropriation of Rasmussen’s narrative. Reading these texts as distinct configurations but also in relation to each other affords a look at modernity as an event that effects adverse change at the same time that it posits itself as a rebuttal to the negative impact it has. Thus, through attention to such tropes as anachronism and opera as a sign of modernity, the article addresses, via Rasmussen, the colonial determinations that inform modernity as well as the decolonizing methods employed in the film that re-purpose modernity while at the same time exposing its limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it