MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808769745 · doi:10.1215/00031283-6926179

Teaching Linguistics through Lexicography

2018· article· en· W2808769745 on OpenAlex
Mark Canada

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Speech · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationIconConversationHistoryLinguisticsLibrary scienceComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| May 01 2018 Teaching Linguistics through Lexicography Mark Canada Mark Canada Indiana University Kokomo mark canada is professor of English and executive vice chancellor for academic affairs at Indiana University Kokomo. He is the author, coauthor, or editor of four books, including Introduction to Information Literacy for Students (Wiley, 2017) and Literature and Journalism in Antebellum America (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011). His articles on student success, Theodore Dreiser, Edgar Allan Poe, and other topics have appeared in The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Conversation, American Literary Realism, and other publications. E-mail: canadam@iuk.edu. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google American Speech (2018) 93 (2): 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-6926179 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter Email Permissions Search Site Citation Mark Canada; Teaching Linguistics through Lexicography. American Speech 1 May 2018; 93 (2): 311–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-6926179 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsAmerican Dialect SocietyAmerican Speech Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2018 American Dialect Society2018 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it