MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808802196 · doi:10.1109/jphotov.2018.2841195

Fabrication and Characterization of a High-Power Assembly With a 20-Junction Monolithically Stacked Laser Power Converter

2018· article· en· W2808802196 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chenggang Guan, Liang Li, Hai‐Ming Ji, Shuai Luo, Pengfei Xu, Qian Gao, Hui Lv, Wen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Photovoltaics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHubei University of TechnologyUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaserOptoelectronicsLaser power scalingPower (physics)Heat sinkJunction temperatureHigh voltageVoltageFabricationMaximum power principleElectrical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasing number of applications require an electrical source with good insulation and high power. Power over fiber (POF) technology has excellent insulating characteristics and thus is attracting increasing attention. The high-voltage laser power converter (HVLPC) is the most important component in the entire POF system, and the monolithically stacked HVLPC, because of its excellent performance characteristics, is particularly suitable for the requirements of high power. In this paper, we designed and prepared a compact high-power assembly with a 20-junction monolithically stacked HVLPC, and the performance characteristics of the designed assembly were separately tested under laser powers from 2 to 43 W with an 808 nm wavelength. More than 20 W of electric power was extracted under 43 W of laser power, and a maximum photon-energy conversion efficiency of 50.4% was observed with an open-circuit voltage of 22.15 V. Additionally, the temperature characteristics of the designed assembly under different laser powers and different loads were separately discussed, and a three-dimensional thermal simulation model for the designed assembly was established to predict the optimized passive heat sink structure. According to the research conclusions in this paper, additional types of high-power assemblies can be similarly designed in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of PhotovoltaicsSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207