MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808831375

〔紹介〕 G.B.Gorton, Misunderstanding Financial Crises: Why We Don’t See Them Coming, Oxford U.P., 2012.

2018· other· en· W2808831375 on OpenAlexfundno aff
裕之 岡田

Bibliographic record

VenueHosei University Repository (Hosei University) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation
KeywordsEconomicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

紹介 1、 「静穏期」の形成:州法銀行時代、国法銀 行時代、中央銀行と預金保険制 本書は、歴史的説明を州法銀行時代、1837-63 年、から始める。 この時期、額面等価保証の国家紙幣はなく、 金銀鋳貨とともに約 1500 種の私的銀行(state banks,private banks)が発行する銀行券が流通 媒体=通貨として機能していた。そして、銀行 券発券保証準備には連邦債・州債の担保を要し、 額面での金銀正貨兌換に応ずべし、と定められ ていた。 しかし額面兌換(金銀貨兌換)は実施されず、 銀行券の通用力の額面割れ、ディスカウント、 は日常的で、 発券銀行リスクもさることながら、 発券銀行に赴く時間と距離の負担が大きかっ た。例えば、ニューヘブン

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.014
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHosei University Repository (Hosei University)Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207