An Improvement on the Number of Limit Cycles Bifurcating from a Nondegenerate Center of Homogeneous Polynomial Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the two articles in Appl. Math. Comput., J. Giné [2012a, 2012b] studied the number of small limit cycles bifurcating from the origin of the system: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are homogeneous polynomials of degree [Formula: see text]. It is shown that the maximal number of the small limit cycles, denoted by [Formula: see text], satisfies [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]; and [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. It seems that the correct answer for their case [Formula: see text] should be [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we apply Hopf bifurcation theory and normal form computation, and perturb the isolated, nondegenerate center (the origin) to prove that [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]; and [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text], which improve Giné’s results with one more limit cycle for each case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it