MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2808843168 · doi:10.4095/292269

Reconnaissance surficial geology, Duggan Lake, Nunavut, NTS 76-H

2013· book· en· W2808843168 on OpenAlexaffabout
D A St-Onge, D E Kerr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeomorphologyHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preliminary surficial geology studies, based on aerial photograph interpretation and limited legacy data, were undertaken in the Duggan Lake map area to provide an improved understanding of distribution and nature of surficial sediments and regional glacial history. Much of the area is extensively covered by a variety of glacial deposits and landforms, though bedrock outcrops can be found throughout the region. Widespread till veneer, blanket and streamlined till are common in the central and eastern areas, whereas hummocky till occurs in the west. Till-dominated terrain is cut by northwest-southeast trending glaciofluvial corridors consisting of eskers, ice-contact sediments, outwash plains and terraces, and locally elongated zones of scoured bedrock. Small isolated glacial lakes were formed by ponding of meltwater. In the northwest, a discontinuous moraine complex, consisting of glaciofluvial sediments and ridged till segments, forms the western extremity of a major end moraine system referred to as the MacAlpine Moraine. Drumlinoids and striations record a regional northwestward ice flow during the last glaciation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→