MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2808850005 · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2018.6.005

A study on improving employees’ behaviour towards increasing students’ loyalty: the mediating role of need understanding, service quality, and intimacy among students in Kenya

2018· article· en· W2808850005 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hayford Amegbe, Charles Hanu, Atsu Nkukpornu

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Science Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDiverse Scientific Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyaltyQuality (philosophy)PsychologyService qualityService (business)BusinessSocial psychologyMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the past few years, there have been various studies on the relationship between academic behavior, teaching and student retention but not much has been on administration staff and students.This study examined improving employees' behavioural factors towards increasing students' loyalty.The paper explores the direct mediation and indirect mediation of employee behavioural factors leading to build student loyalty.More specifically the focus is on the constructs of service quality (SQLTY), need understanding (NEEDUND), intimacy (INTIMACY), and student loyalty (STLOY).This study depended on a positivist research paradigm.In this study, over 800 structured questionnaires were administered for research subjects.However, 743 were captured for the final analysis.The analytical tool used in this study is the ADANCO 2.0.1 software and in terms of statistical processing, the PLS-SEM technique was utilized.The two main takeaways from the direct relationships are that INTIMACY is a strong predictor of STLOY, and NEEDUND is also a strong predictor of SQLTY.The indirect mediations of INTIMACY on SQLTY and STLOY, IN-TIMACY on NEEDUND and STLOY, and SQLTY on NEEDUND and INTIMACY were all not supported.The study, like any academic work, has limitations.Despite these limitations, this study offers theoretical as well as practical values for the research community and administrators of universities and higher education administrators as a whole.For administrators of the universities and the higher education, the study points out the critical needs for administrators to better understand students' loyalty and behaviours of employees during the service encounter, which could lead to intimacy and eventually student loyalty.The present study is innovated by quantitatively examining how the above-mentioned behavioural factors of employees could lead to INTIMACY and STLOY.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement Science Letters→Same topicDiverse Scientific Research Studies→French-language works237,207→