MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808857465 · doi:10.2118/191124-pa

Proppant-Conductivity Testing Under Simulated Reservoir Conditions: Impact of Crushing, Embedment, and Diagenesis on Long-Term Production in Shales

2018· article· en· W2808857465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleCompactionPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyHydraulic fracturingGeotechnical engineeringCoringEmbedmentHydraulic conductivityPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceDrillingMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Hydraulic fractures act as conduits connecting a wellbore to nanodarcy-permeability unconventional reservoirs. Proppants are responsible for enhancing the fracture conductivity, and they help in maintaining high production rates. This study is focused on the measurement of long-term conductivity of proppant packs at simulated reservoir-temperature and pressure conditions. Various conductivity-impairment mechanisms such as proppant crushing, fines migration, embedment, and diagenesis are investigated. Testing was performed with a conductivity cell that allows simultaneous measurement of fracture compaction and permeability. The proppant-pack performance during compression between metal and shale platens was compared. The proppant-filled fracture (concentration of 0.75–3 lbm/ft2) is subjected to axial load (5,000 psi) to simulate closure stress. Brine (3% NaCl + 0.5% KCl) is flowed through the pack at a constant rate (3 cm3/min) at 250°F during an extended duration of time (10–60 days). In this study, Ottawa sand proppant was used between platen facies fabricated from Vaca Muerta and Eagle Ford shales. Testing between metal platens indicated that the reduction in permeability with 20/40-mesh Ottawa sand (≈30% during 12 days) was less than that of 60/100-mesh Ottawa sand, which suffered a 99% reduction in only 4 days. Measurements with 20/40-mesh Ottawa sand between shale platens were conducted at 1.5 lbm/ft2. During a duration of 10 days, the Eagle Ford platens proppant pack exhibits a greater reduction in permeability, in comparison with Vaca Muerta platens. The normalized compaction for Eagle Ford shale platens is 20% more than Vaca Muerta platens because of greater proppant embedment. Particle-size analysis and scanning-electron-microscopy (SEM) images verify proppant crushing, fines migration, and embedment as dominant damage mechanisms. These factors are observed to depend on the testing of shales. The results suggest a substantial degradation of permeability during the initial 5 days of testing, after which the permeability appears to stabilize. Crushed proppant and dislodged shale-surface particles contribute to the fines generated; a greater concentration of fines is observed downstream. In a separate study between Vaca Muerta platens, under similar closure stress and temperature conditions at 2-lbm/ft2 proppant concentration, the permeability reduced by almost three orders of magnitude during a duration of 60 days. It was also observed that growth of diagenetic smectite is accelerated by making the fluid more basic (pH of 10).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it