MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L’Algérie coloniale, ou l’Andalousie heureuse

2018· article· fr· W2808894310 on OpenAlex
Tristan Leperlier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-anthropologie · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNorth African History and Literature
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La guerre civile algérienne des années 1990 a créé les conditions de possibilité d’un développement d’un « mythe andalou » autour de l’Algérie coloniale chez les écrivains algériens exilés en France. Ces historiens souterrains que sont les écrivains algériens rappellent, en tant qu’intellectuels, francophones et laïcs (ou du moins anti-islamistes), le raffinement intellectuel, le métissage culturel, et la tolérance religieuse du passé, et particulièrement celui de la présence française, eux qui découvrent en France la communauté pied-noir. Mais à travers la réhabilitation de la figure du pied-noir, c’est moins le métissage culturel de la période coloniale que la dénonciation de l’imposition actuelle en Algérie d’une identité arabo-musulmane stricte qui est en jeu. Dans les textes de la période, en particulier de La gardienne des ombres de Waciny Laredj, c’est une Andalousie perdue, plurielle d’avant l’exil, qui se détache des ruines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it