MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808898165 · doi:10.2118/191238-ms

Property Changes of Formation Rocks under Electromagnetic Heating: An Experimental Study

2018· article· en· W2808898165 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChengdu University of Technology
KeywordsOil shalePetrophysicsCarbonateMineralogyPorosityPyriteCarbonate rockCarbonate mineralsGeologyCompactionMaterials scienceComposite materialCalcite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electromagnetic (EM) heating has been proposed to recover heavy oil due to its great environmental friendliness. Previous studies focused on investigating the feasibility and enhancing the oil recovery of such non-aqueous method. However, the effect of EM heating on the variations of formation rock properties is still elusive. Detailed experiments/measurements are required to understand the effect of EM heating on changing the petrophysical properties of formation rocks. A commercial microwave oven is used to conduct the EM heating experiments. Different types of formation rocks (shale, Berea-sandstone, tight sandstone, and Indiana-carbonate) are investigated. Various techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), N2 adsorption/desorption, and X-Ray fluorescence (XRF), are used to characterize the properties of shale samples before/after experiments. The porosity and permeability measurement are performed to Berea sandstone, tight sandstone, and Indiana carbonate. An infrared thermometer is used to measure the samples’ surface temperatures. Furthermore, oven-heating experiments are conducted to distinguish the effects of conductive-heating and EM heating on the property changes of rock-samples. Results show that different types of rocks exhibit different responses to EM heating; shale samples exhibit a higher temperature compared with sandstone and carbonate because of the better EM energy absorbance of clays and pyrite. The shale samples are crumbled into pieces or fractured after EM heating, while the sandstone and carbonate samples remain almost unchanged after EM heating. The SEM results reveal that EM heating causes tensile failure, shrinkage of clay, and release of volatile organic content to the shale sample. The N2 adsorption/desorption measurements demonstrate that the pore volume significantly increases due to clay shrinkage, while part of the pore can be blocked by the converted bituminous kerogen after EM heating. EM heating has almost no effect on Berea sandstone and Indiana carbonate due to the transparency of quartz and calcite to EM waves. However, the EM heating can fracture the tight sandstone that is saturated with water because of the rapid rise of pore pressure under EM heating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it