MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2808899490 · doi:10.4095/293424

Surficial geology, Reliance, Northwest Territories, NTS 75-K

2014· report· en· W2808899490 on OpenAlexaffabout
D E Kerr, R D Knight, D R Sharpe, David Cummings

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOutwash plainBedrockMeltwaterGlacial periodDrumlinGeomorphologyFluvialRiver terracesOverbankAlluviumBayPhysical geographyHydrology (agriculture)ArchaeologyOceanographyIce streamGeographyCryosphereStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Reliance map area is characterized by three main elements based on distribution and nature of surficial sediments. The northeast and southeast map areas have a greater cover of fluted and drumlinized till blanket, with some transitional till veneer. Throughout the rest of the map sheet, extensive areas of bedrock predominate, with minor isolated deposits of till. The Lockhart and Snowdrift river valleys are predominantly infilled by meandering alluvial and terraced glaciofluvial sediments, some with active dunes. In these valleys, terraces and outwash plains occur at various elevations, including 230 m, 245 m, 260 m, 305 m, and 320 m a.s.l. Some may be related to glacial Lake McConnell, as are raised beaches at 335 m a.s.l. in McLeod Bay. Glaciofluvial corridors, of various magnitudes, consisting of eskers, ice-contact sediments, and scoured bedrock, trend generally southwestward to westward across the map area. Isolated glaciolacustrine deltas record local ponding of glacial meltwater. The last dominant ice flow varied from southwestward to westward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→