Insights into Mg<sup>2+</sup> Intercalation in a Zero-Strain Material: Thiospinel Mg<sub><i>x</i></sub>Zr<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mg battery cathode material, thiospinel MgxZr2S4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1), exhibits negligible volume change (ca. 0.05%) during electrochemical cycling, providing valuable insight into the limiting factors in divalent cation intercalation. Rietveld refinement of XRD data for MgxZr2S4 electrodes at various states of charge, , coupled with EDX analysis, demonstrates that Mg2+ can be inserted into Zr2S4 at 60 °C up to x = 0.7 at a C/10 rate (up to x = 0.9 at very slow rates) and cycled with a high Coulombic efficiency of 99.75%. HAADF-STEM studies provide clear visual evidence of Mg-ion occupation in the lattice, whereas XAS studies show that Zr4+ was reduced upon Mg2+ intercalation. Operando and synchrotron XRD studies reveal the creation of two phases during the latter stages of discharge (x > 0.5) as the lattice fills and Mg2+ ions begin occupying tetrahedral (8a) sites in addition to octahedral (16c) interstitial sites. Compared to the isostructural Ti2S4 thiospinel, Zr2S4 presents a slightly larger cell volume and hence an almost ideal zero-strain lattice on Mg2+ insertion. Nonetheless, its 4-fold lower electronic conductivity results in a diffusion coefficient for Mg2+ ions (DMg; 1 × 10–10 to 1 × 10–9 cm2/s) that is more than a factor of 10 lower than in Ti2S4. This shows that delocalization of the electron charge carriers in the framework is a very important factor in governing multivalent ion diffusivity in the thiospinel framework and, by extension, in other materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".