MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808947226 · doi:10.7939/r3tx35n3s

Distribution, biodiversity, and function of glass sponge reefs in the Hecate Strait, British Columbia, Canada

2018· article· en· W2808947226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMarine Sponges and Natural Products
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReefOceanographyFisheryBiodiversityGeographyDistribution (mathematics)SpongeGeologyEcologyPaleontologyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reefs of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida) off western Canada were recently established as a marine protected area (MPA), however effective management and monitoring of this MPA is hindered by a lack of baseline data about reef distributions and biodiversity. MPA boundaries were established around reef polygons mapped using multibeam acoustics. Multibeam technology does not differentiate between live, dead, and buried portions of sponges. To ground-truth past multibeam mapping, a remote operated vehicle (ROV) was used to conduct fine-scale photographic surveys at three reef sites in the Hecate Strait, British Columbia. I performed semivariogram analyses and spatial interpolations to produce maps of reef distributions. The relationship between glass sponges and associated megafauna (> 2 cm) was analyzed from ROV images. Polygons mapped by multibeam acoustics represented the densest areas of sponge with ~10% of live and dead sponges found outside these polygons, while the remaining area was bare substrate (i.e. buried sponge or patches of mud). Glass sponges were patchily distributed in the reefs and spatially dependent at 28 to 36 meters. Although total megafauna density was significantly higher in the presence of glass sponges, glass sponges did not correlate with an increase in all taxa. Megafauna associations in the reefs occurred at a taxon-specific level and sponge reef structural complexity was found to be an important influence on reef community structure. The reefs also hosted numerous non-reef forming sponges, which until now have been previously overlooked. Molecular analyses and taxonomic classification were used to identify multiple encrusting sponges in the reefs, of which one was a new cryptic sponge in the genus Desmacella. This study garnered baseline data for Fisheries and Oceans Canada to improve their capacity for monitoring changes in the status and health of sponge reef ecosystems in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it