MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809038638 · doi:10.1177/0840470418764492

New strategies and innovations to engage seniors in eldercare

2018· review· en· W2809038638 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Levitt

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityAbbotsford Veterinary ClinicBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologySummit Pacific CollegeUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipDomain (mathematical analysis)BusinessHealth careQuality (philosophy)NursingProcess managementKnowledge managementPsychologyPublic relationsComputer scienceMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eldercare is a significant challenge globally. The role of health leaders is foremost as agents of the transformational change needed to address the increasing demands for long-term care. This article applies the System Transformation domain of the LEADS leadership capabilities framework to redesign the delivery of care and housing to the aging demographic. A literature review reveals the radical shifts in how programs and services support person-centred care and quality life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207