Bibliographic record
Abstract
La comparaison de L'île de la Demoiselle d'Anne Hébert et de la soixante-septième nouvelle de L'Heptaméron de Marguerite de Navarre permet d'interroger précisément la manière dont l'époque de rédaction et l'appartenance culturelle des auteures agissent sur le traitement littéraire d'une même anecdote légendaire.L'incidence des choix génériques et énonciatifs met en évidence des distinctions axiologiques importantes, concernant en particulier la représentation de la femme et celle d'une société pyramidale patriarcale, sous le regard divin.C'est pourtant la filiation que cette comparaison fait apparaître de manière flagrante, soulignant dans la poétique hébertienne l'importance accordée à la voix : les voix des « devisants » de L'Heptaméron réécrites en voix de personnages radiophoniques, et mieux encore la voix de l'auteure elle-même résonnant de l'écho de la conteuse emblématique du patrimoine français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".