MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809124484 · doi:10.1163/15700690-12341402

Copyist B of the Erasmiana Manuscripts in Gouda Identified

2018· article· en· W2809124484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Willem Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaerendo · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFifteenthIdentity (music)ArtHistory of the bookQuarter (Canadian coin)LiteratureHistoryClassicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the past I have written about the two copyists of the Gouda Erasmiana manuscripts, indicated by P.S. Allen as Copyist A and Copyist B. The identity of Copyist A has been revealed earlier as Henricus Jacobi Leidensis, a monk in the Stein convent, who was active in the first quarter of the fifteenth century. Copyist B, however—who was active around 1590—remained unknown. Further research brought up a name, which I had encountered earlier, but which I did not relate with the Erasmiana manuscripts. It concerns a monk who lived in Stein, but moved to Amsterdam in 1560, long before Copyst B wrote the manuscripts. And died there. This leads to one conclusion: the parts of the Erasmiana manuscripts written by copyist B, did not originate from the monastery of Stein or from Gouda, but were compiled in Amsterdam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaerendoSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207