MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809140286 · doi:10.4095/293892

Geology, Tebesjuak Lake, Nunavut

2014· report· en· W2809140286 on OpenAlexaffabout
T D Peterson, J M J Scott, A N LeCheminant, L B Chorlton, B M A D'Aoust

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryArchaeologyGeomorphologyPhysical geographyEarth scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The map area is underpinned by three Archean terranes from west to southeast: the Snow Island Suite of 2.6 Ga granite-rhyolite (AS), the Marjorie Hills assemblage of metasedimentary and granitoid gneiss (AMH), and orthogneiss of the Chesterfield block (unit Agn). The AS-AMH boundary is the Wharton Lake fault system, initially a southwest-dipping detachment. The AMH-Agn boundary is the dextral extensional Tulemalu Fault. Brittle reactivations of these faults localized sub-basins of the Baker Lake Group and hosted coeval intrusions of Martell Syenite (minette / ~1.83 Ga Hudson Granite mix). A Hudson Granite plug intrudes the AMH. Early gabbro/anorthosite (~1.77 Ga) of the Kivalliq igneous suite was intruded by Nueltin granite, co-magmatic with bimodal Pitz Formation lavas and the ~1.75 Ga, 015° McRae Lake diabase dyke swarm and compositionally related 075° Thelon River dyke swarm. Cu-Pb veins and replacements formed near mafic centres and Au-Ag-bearing quartz veins near felsic centres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207