MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2809182358 · doi:10.4095/297283

Geology, Iglulik, Victoria Island, Northwest Territories

2015· report· en· W2809182358 on OpenAlexaffabout
J H Bédard, R H Rainbird

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyGeographyOceanographyPhysical geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NTS 87-G/08 (Iglulik) straddles Minto Inlet. On the north shore, massive to bedded carbonates of the Boot Inlet and Jago Bay formations, quartz rich sandstone of the Fort Collinson Formation, and evaporites of the Minto Inlet Formation (Neoproterozoic Shaler Supergroup) host Type 1 and feldspar-porphyritic Type 2 sills. To the east, the Iglulik Peninsula is underlain by rocks of the Minto Inlet Formation and limestones and shales of the lower Wynniatt Formation. Minto Inlet strata host Type 1 sills. The southern shore of Minto Inlet is underlain by the upper carbonate members of the Wynniatt Formation into which were intruded Type 1 and 2 sills. A thin cap of Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks overlies an erosional unconformity on a hilltop. Toward the south, sparse exposures of Lower Kilian Formation carbonates and evaporites host Type 2 sills. All Proterozoic strata dip shallowly to the south, marking the transition from the Walker Bay Anticline to the Holman Island Syncline. North-northwest trending synmagmatic normal faults are exposed locally. East-northeast-trending post-Proterozoic normal faults locally show north-side down motions and repeat contacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→