MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2809223750 · doi:10.4095/293423

Surficial geology, Snowdrift, Northwest Territories, NTS 75-L

2014· report· en· W2809223750 on OpenAlexaffabout
D E Kerr, R D Knight, D R Sharpe, David Cummings, B A Kjarsgaard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutwash plainGeologyBedrockGeomorphologyGlacial periodTributaryDrumlinColluviumFluvialAlluviumGeochemistryOceanographyGeographyIce streamStructural basinCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Snowdrift map area is characterized by predominantly glaciated, scoured and washed bedrock terrain. The more elevated areas north and south of the East Arm have isolated deposits of till veneer and blanket. Within the East Arm, some low lying depressions between bedrock ridges are infilled by glaciolacustrine sediments, with various colluvial deposits covering the steepest slopes. Glaciofluvial complexes consisting of eskers, ice-contact sediments and outwash, trend southwestward in the north and westward in the southern map areas. The Snowdrift River valley and its tributaries are predominantly infilled by terraced and floodplain alluvial sediments, and ridged and outwash glaciofluvial sediments, some with active dunes. The last ice flow recorded by glacial striae, fluted bedrock and crag-and-tails, was generally southwestward to westward, in the extreme southeast region of the map area. At various elevations, evidence of glacial Lake McConnell is found: isolated glaciolacustrine deltas at 350 m, 335 m, 320 m, 275 m, 260 m; washing limits at 335 m and 320 m; and raised beaches and wave-cut terraces at 335 m, 320 m, 305 m, 285 m, 228 m, 213 m, 200 m, 183 m and 168 m a.s.l.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→