MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809262272 · doi:10.3390/vibration1010006

Stochastic Stability of a Class of MEMS-Based Vibratory Gyroscopes under Input Rate Fluctuations

2018· article· en· W2809262272 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Bognash, Samuel F. Asokanthan

Bibliographic record

VenueVibration · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGyroscopeControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov exponentNoise (video)Parametric statisticsStability (learning theory)Nonlinear systemDiscretizationMathematicsStatistical physicsPhysicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of stochastic fluctuations in the input angular rate of a class of single axis mass-spring microelectromechanical (MEM) gyroscopes on the system stability is investigated. A white noise fluctuation is introduced in the coupled 2-DOF model that represents the system dynamics for the purposes of stability prediction. Numerical simulations are performed employing the resulting set of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) that govern the system dynamics. The SDEs are discretized using the higher-order Milstein scheme for numerical computations. Simulations via the Euler scheme, as well as the measure of the largest Lyapunov exponent are employed for validation purposes due to a lack of similar analytical solutions or experimental data. Responses have been predicted under different noise fluctuation magnitudes and different input angular rates for stability investigations. A parametric study is performed to estimate the noise intensity stability threshold for a range of quality factor values at different input angular rates. The predicted results show a nonlinear dependence of the threshold on the quality factors for different input rates. Under typical gyroscope operating conditions, a realistic frequency mismatch appears to have insignificant influence on system stability. It is envisaged that the present quantitative predictions will aid improvements in performance, reliability, and the design process for this class of devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVibrationSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207