MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809267483 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2018.2848273

Modified Sphere Decoding for Sparse Code Multiple Access

2018· article· en· W2809267483 on OpenAlexaff
Lanping Li, Jinming Wen, Xiaohu Tang, Chintha Tellambura

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsDecoding methodsComputer scienceCode (set theory)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Programming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse code multiple access (SCMA), a novel non-orthogonal multiple access scheme for fifth generation wireless, has drawn much attention. Since optimal SCMA detection incurs high computational complexity, we develop a modified single tree search (MSTS) to obtain soft outputs for coded SCMA. The MSTS algorithm incorporates the sorting of the channel matrix and computing a non-zero low bound before searching in order to reduce complexity during the search stage. The simulation results show that MSTS not only has lower computational complexity than detectors based on the message passing algorithm (MPA) and repeat tree search but also keeps its performance level close to that of MPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207