MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809309006 · doi:10.4095/291565

Geology, Ellef Ringnes Island north, Nunavut

2012· report· en· W2809309006 on OpenAlexaffabout
C A Evenchick, Ashton F. Embry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyPaleontologyGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ellef Ringnes Island lies in the western Queen Elizabeth Islands, Nunavut, Canada (parts of NTS 69-C, -D, -E, -F, -G and 79-D, -E, -H). The bedrock consists mainly of Jurassic to latest Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the Sverdrup Basin, and a thin veneer of Neogene sediments in the far north, adjacent to the Arctic Ocean. Strata are intruded by Cretaceous mafic sills and dykes, disrupted by several evaporite diapirs, and folded by northwest-trending folds associated with Eurekan (Paleogene) deformation. The majority of sills are concentrated close to the contact between Deer Bay and Isachsen formations (late Valanginian), but range as high as the lower Hassel Formation (late Albian). In the central and southern island, steeply dipping extensional faults occur in patterns radial to the evaporite domes. In the northern half of the island, steep faults and associated minor folds trend north-northeast, with the addition of east trending normal faults in the far north.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207