MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809324534 · doi:10.4095/292861

Geology, Calder River, Northwest Territories, NTS 86-F

2014· report· en· W2809324534 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert S. Hildebrand, Samuel A. Bowring, K S Pelletier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyHydrology (agriculture)GeomorphologyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The area includes Archean rocks of Slave craton and Paleoproterozoic rocks of Wopmay orogen. Both groups of rocks were deformed at 1.882 Ga during the Calderian orogeny (Hildebrand et al., 2010a). Rocks of Slave craton and its cover occur in the eastern part of the map area within and east of the medial zone (Hildebrand et al., 1990), where they form a crustal duplex structurally beneath rocks of Hottah terrane, which comprises metasedimentary rocks of Akaitcho group (Easton, 1982) sitting unconformably upon Bent gneiss (Hildebrand et al., 1991), and intruded by plutons of Hepburn batholith (Lalonde, 1986). Sitting unconformably atop, and intruding, the collapsed collision zone, are magmatic and sedimentary rocks of the 1.875-1.843 Ga Great Bear magmatic zone (Hoffman and McGlynn, 1977; Hildebrand et al., 1987b, 2010b). Rocks of the area were folded about northwest to northerly trending axes and cut by a swarm of strike-slip faults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207