MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809324798 · doi:10.1016/j.lers.2018.06.001

Real-time computerized video enhancement for minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery

2018· article· en· W2809324798 on OpenAlexaff
Praneeth Sadda, John A. Onofrey, Metehan İmamoğlu, Xenophon Papademetris, Bilal Qarni, Mert Ozan Bahtiyar

Bibliographic record

VenueLaparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceContrast (vision)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The only definitive treatment for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome is minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for the selective coagulation of placental blood vessels. Fetoscopic surgery is a technically challenging operation, mainly due to the poor visibility conditions in the uterine environment. We present the design of an algorithm for the computerized enhancement of fetoscopic video and show that the enhanced video increases the ability of human users to identify blood vessels within fetoscopic video rapidly and accurately. Methods A computer algorithm for the enhancement of fetoscopic video frames was created. First, optical fiber artifacts were removed via a modification of unsharp masking. Second, image contrast was increased via Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE). Third, the effect of contrast enhancements on stationary features was removed by normalizing to a windowed mean of the video frames. Fourth, color information was reincorporated by combining the mean-normalized result with the unnormalized contrast enhanced image using the soft light blending algorithm. Medical trainees ( n = 16) were recruited into a study to validate the algorithm. Subjects were shown enhanced or unenhanced fetoscopic video frames on a screen and were asked to identify whether a randomly placed marker fell on a blood vessel or on background. The accuracy of their responses was recorded. Results On the subset of images where subjects had the lowest mean accuracy in identifying the placement of the marker, subjects performed better when viewing video frames enhanced by the computer (accuracy 74.27%; SE 0.97) than when viewing unenhanced video frames (accuracy 63.78%; SE 2.79). This result was statistically significant ( p < 0.01). Conclusion Real-time computerized enhancement of fetoscopic video has the potential to ease the readability of video in poor lighting conditions, thus providing a benefit to the surgeon intraoperatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic SurgerySame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207