MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809382207 · doi:10.1155/2018/4181649

Neural Dynamics during Resting State: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Exploration with Reduction and Visualization

2018· article· en· W2809382207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComplexity · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEisaiGenentechIXICONorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerBiogenBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaEli Lilly and CompanyU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBristol-Myers SquibbNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingResting state fMRINeuroscienceTrajectorySIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkFrequency bandVisualizationMagnetic resonance imagingArtificial intelligencePsychologyPattern recognition (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsMedicineTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The brain is a complex high‐order system. Body movements or mental activities are both dependent on the transmission of information among billions of neurons. However, potential patterns are hardly discoverable due to the high dimensionality in neural signals. Previous studies have identified rotary trajectories in rhythm and nonrhythm movements when projecting the neural electrical signals into a two‐dimensional space. However, it is unclear how well this analogy holds at the resting state. Given the low‐frequency fluctuations noted during spontaneous neural activities using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), it is natural to hypothesize that the neural response at resting state also shows a periodic trajectory. In this study, we explored the potential patterns in resting state fMRI data at four frequency bands (slow 2 – slow 5) on two cohorts, one of which consisted of young and elderly adults and the other of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and normal controls (NC). The jPCA algorithm was applied to reduce the high‐dimensional BOLD signal into a two‐dimensional space for visualization of the trajectory. The results indicated that the “resting state” is a basic state showing an inherent dynamic pattern with a low frequency and long period during normal aging, with changes appearing in the rotary period at the slow 4 frequency band (0.027–0.073 Hz) during the pathological process of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). These findings expand the original understanding that neural signals can rotate themselves and that motor executive signals consist of neural signals. Meanwhile, the rotary period at band slow 4 may be a physiological marker for AD, and studies of this frequency band may be useful for understanding the potential pathophysiology of AD and ultimately facilitate characterization and auxiliary diagnosis of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it