Spatio‐temporal cladoceran (Branchiopoda) responses to climate change and UV radiation in subarctic ecotonal lakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aim To understand modern and past aquatic community responses to climate‐induced shifts in productivity and ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure. Location Tree line ecotone from north boreal forest to subarctic tundra in northeastern Finnish Lapland. Taxon Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Methods Thirty‐one small and shallow lakes were examined for summer epilimnetic communities (SEC) and surface sediment fossil integrative communities (FIC) of Cladocera for species distribution and their environmental correlations. A 700‐year down‐core sediment sequence from a tree line lake (Námmájávri) was analysed for FICs and cladoceran‐inferred UV absorbance (ABSUV, indicative of melanin pigmentation) for evidence of long‐term community and photoprotective responses and compared with records of palaeotemperature, solar intensity, and composite sediment biogeochemistry by variance partitioning analysis. Results The SECs were primarily correlated with specific UV absorbance (indicative of UV exposure) and total phosphorus and FICs by mean July air temperature and total nitrogen. The Námmájávri FICs showed subtle changes with a directional shift between the 19th and 21st centuries and were mostly explained by solar intensity. ABSUV exhibited increases during the 18th and 20th centuries, being related to variation in sediment biogeochemistry, which was indicative of changes in auto‐ versus allochthonous production. Main conclusions The ecotonal distribution of cladocerans is sensitive to temperature, nutrients, and allochthonous carbon, which is closely linked with UV exposure. The long‐term community shifts and photoprotection have been governed by solar intensity and biogeochemical shifts through lake water optics, attributable to direct UV impact or climate‐mediated intensification in photodegradation of allochthonous carbon. Estimations of the dual effects and mechanisms of increasing temperatures and UV on subarctic lakes and their biota remain challenging as their individual impacts on key species were partly contradictory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".