Similar Variability of Fasting and 24-h Self-Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in Insulin-Naïve Adults with T2DM—The Randomized BRIGHT Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BRIGHT was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, 24-week study in insulin naïve participants with uncontrolled T2DM, investigating efficacy and safety of Gla-300 and IDeg-100. Participants were randomized to Gla-300 or IDeg-100, titrated to a target fasting SMPG of 80-100 mg/dL. The primary objective (non-inferiority of Gla-300 vs. IDeg-100 in HbA1c change from baseline to week 24) was met. Secondary endpoints, presented here, included change in variability of fasting and 24-h SMPG. Eight-point SMPG profiles were similar for both groups at week 24. Mean baseline coefficient of variation (CV) of ≥3 fasting SMPG measurements over 7 days was 13.73% and 14.63% for Gla-300 and IDeg-100, respectively. Change in fasting SMPG variability (SE) to week 24 was 1.49% (0.39) and 1.97% (0.39) for Gla-300 and IDeg-100 (least squares [LS] mean difference [95% CI] −0.48 [−1.49 to 0.53]) (Figure a). Mean baseline CVs for 8-point profiles (24-h SMPG) were 22.60% and 23.41% for Gla-300 and IDeg-100. Mean change in 24-h SMPG variability (SE) was 3.70% (0.59) and 3.95% (0.60) for Gla-300 and IDeg-100 at week 24 (LS mean difference −0.25 [−1.72 to 1.22]) (Figure b). In summary, Gla-300 and IDeg-100 had similar variability of fasting and 24-hour SMPG over the 24-week treatment period in BRIGHT. Disclosure A.Y.Y. Cheng: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Abbott. Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Advisory Panel; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Takeda Canada Inc.. Research Support; Self; Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. R. Ritzel: Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Servier. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Z. Bosnyak: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. E. Boelle-Le Corfec: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. A.M. Cali: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. X. Wang: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. J.P. Frias: Research Support; Self; AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Consultant; Self; CeQur Corporation. Research Support; Self; Cirius Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Calibra Medical, Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc.. Consultant; Self; Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ICON plc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Consultant; Self; Johnson & Johnson Diabetes Institute, LLC.. Research Support; Self; Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Consultant; Self; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc., Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Theracos, Inc. R. Roussel: Advisory Panel; Self; AbbVie Inc., Abbott, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S, AstraZeneca. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Servier. Consultant; Self; Bayer AG. Advisory Panel; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. Research Support; Self; Amgen Inc., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S, Danone Research. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Iriade. Advisory Panel; Self; Physiogenex S.A.S. G.B. Bolli: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Menarini Group, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".