MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809514800 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v9n1p77

Solid Waste Generation in Europe: Study of Affecting Factors Using Panel Data

2018· article· en· W2809514800 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aggelopoulos Athanasios, Dimitrios Komninos, Zacharias Dermatis, Αθανάσιος Αναστασίου, Liargovas Panagiotis

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanel dataMunicipal solid wasteEconometric modelEconometricsEconomicsEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The factors that affect the quantity of solid waste inside the EU-28 but also in Switzerland and Norway for the period 1995 to 2014 are examined with the help of econometric model study based on panel data. The correlation between the quantity of solid waste generated and various factors is examined thoroughly and a separate reference of the consequences of the economic crisis on the quantity of the produced solid waste is presented. The results of the model study will be the basis for drawing conclusions of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.421
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.025 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207