MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809518121 · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.009

Study protocol: Mobilizing Asian men in Canada to reduce stigma of mental illness

2018· article· en· W2809518121 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sepali Guruge, Kenneth Fung, Souraya Sidani, David Este, Marina Morrow, Kwame McKenzie, Josephine Pui‐Hing Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of CalgaryToronto Western HospitalWellesley InstituteToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionMental illnessStigma (botany)Mental healthMedicineEmpowermentPopulationGerontologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1000.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.447
GPT teacher head0.586
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Clinical TrialsSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207