MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2809555374 · doi:10.4095/293624

Reconnaissance surficial geology, Lynx Lake, Northwest Territories, NTS 75-J

2014· report· en· W2809555374 on OpenAlexaffabout
D E Kerr, R D Knight, D R Sharpe, David Cummings

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBedrockGlacial periodMoraineLandformGeomorphologyPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lynx Lake map area is characterized by three transitional zones based on distribution and nature of surficial sediments. In the southwest, large areas of bedrock and till veneer predominate. Northwest and central regions exhibit an increase in overburden cover, notably fluted till blanket. The northeast and southeast map areas have a greater cover of till veneer, till blanket which is fluted and drumlinized, and hummocky till. The later may contain large, subdued moraine ridges of variable orientation. The entire map area is dissected by glaciofluvial corridors consisting of eskers, ice-contact sediments and scoured bedrock, trending westward in the north and west-southwestward in the central and southern regions. The earliest ice flow, inferred from rare striae and subtle fluted landforms in the eastern half of the map area, was southwestward. The last dominant ice flow was westward in the north, grading slightly west-southwestward, in the central and southern regions. In the Whitefish Lake-Garde Lake area, as well as Lynx Lake-Howard Lake area, glaciolacustrine beaches and washing limits are developed on the flanks of some drumlinoids and glaciofluvial sediments. They occur up to 25-30 m above current lake levels but the extent of these short-lived glacial lakes remains uncertain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→