Bibliographic record
Abstract
El patrimonio y particularmente el Patrimonio Cultural se ha convertido en uno de los principales temas de discusión de la actualidad.La preocupación por conservar el pasado es notable durante los dos últimos siglos, la misma que pasa por el afán de algunos sectores de retener la memoria de sus herencias familiares (Urbano 1998), hasta el intento y dilema que actualmente afrontan muchas naciones del planeta de preservar el pasado sin dejar de construir el futuro, conciliar la cultura con el desarrollo (Mayor 1997).Paralelamente se plantean problemas rel acionados con el alto costo económico necesario para su mantenimiento, los recursos financieros que hagan posible su "aprovechamiento" por parte de la actuales generaciones y conservación para las futuras.Aparece así el turismo como una de las alternativas más atractivas para hacer factible la generación de ingresos que posibiliten mantener viva la riqueza patrimonial de los pueblos.Ante el creciente desarrollo de la millonaria actividad turística mundial se presentan nuevos enfoques que nos llevan a cuestionar la puesta en marcha de proyectos turísticos, de Nº 1, Enero 2000
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".