MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2809611747 · doi:10.4095/293047

Reconnaissance surficial geology, Yellow Bluff (west), Nunavut, NTS 46-D west

2013· report· en· W2809611747 on OpenAlexaffabout
L A Dredge, I McMartin, J E Campbell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluffGeologyArchaeologyGeographyPhysical geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preliminary surficial geology studies, based on air photo interpretation and limited field data, were undertaken in the Yellow Bluff West map area (NTS 46-D west) to provide an understanding of the distribution and nature of surficial materials, and regional glacial history. Much of the area is underlain by folded and faulted bedrock containing shallow glacially scoured lake basins. Striae on bedrock surfaces indicate ice flow toward the southeast. Till veneers are present in the area. Bare bedrock and modified till surfaces result from removal and/or reworking of glacial materials by glacial meltwater and postglacial marine wave-washing. Three major esker systems are associated with subglacial conduits, in which are aligned linear units of glaciofluvial hummocks and ridges. Below 150 m a.s.l, the flanks of the eskers have been reworked into beaches or flattened by the postglacial Tyrrell Sea. Except in areas around eskers where marine deposits are thickest, marine sediments are generally thin, and consist primarily of sand. Raised marine beaches oriented approximately parallel to the coast lie at low elevations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→