MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809612543 · doi:10.4095/293264

Geology, Toad River (northeast), British Columbia

2013· report· en· W2809612543 on OpenAlexaffabout
M E McMechan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToadGeologyArchaeologyPaleontologyOceanographyGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Toad River northeast area (NTS 94-N/NE) in western Liard Basin is underlain by a thick Mississippian to Cretaceous clastic-dominated succession deformed into a few north- or northeast-trending folds. Local abrupt changes in the thickness of Permian sandstone-carbonate and chert units indicate episodes of older block faulting. A major unconformity at the base of the Cretaceous has removed much of the Triassic succession preserved to the southwest. A prominent escarpment capped by Upper Cretaceous Dunvegan conglomerate marks the west limb of the Liard syncline. To the east, poorly exposed Upper Cretaceous conglomerate, shale, and sandstone outline gentle folds. In the Liard Fold and Thrust Belt to the west, four prominent, south-plunging anticlines occur near 60°N. West-directed backthrusts, that follow the locus of older structures and die out southward, offset their steeper west limb at Paleozoic levels. Significant natural gas reserves occur in middle Devonian carbonate beneath the Beaver River Anticline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207