Analysis of Consensus-Based Economic Dispatch Algorithm Under Time Delays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under consensus-based economic dispatch (ED) algorithm, multiple agents, which control local generation units, cooperatively minimize the total generation cost subject to the balance of the generation and expected demand in smart grids. As ubiquitous time delays on communication links exist in communication networks, studying the effect of delays on the dispatch performance is of both theoretical merit and practical value for the efficient and stable operation of smart grids. In this paper, we consider a well-developed consensus-based ED protocol under constant time delays. We find that there always exists a sufficiently small learning gain parameter under finite constant delays such that the convergence of the consensus-based algorithm is guaranteed. Further, an analytical expression of the upper bound is established for the learning gain parameter, which is determined by the largest delay, the weight matrix and the parameters of generation cost functions. In order to guarantee the optimality of the final solution, we propose the updating rule for iterations when initial states are not received by their neighbors due to time delays. The optimality of the final solution under the proposed updating rule is analyzed. We validate our theoretical results through extensive simulation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it