MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809620661 · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00238

Effect of Size and Shape of Nitrogen-Containing Aromatics on Conformational Preferences of DNA Containing Damaged Guanine

2018· article· en· W2809620661 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan W. Kung, Purshotam Sharma, Stacey D. Wetmore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for InnovationAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsGuanineDNAChemistryConformational changeNitrogenCrystallographyComputational chemistryBiophysicsStereochemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryBiologyGeneNucleotide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work investigates the effects of the size and shape of the nitrogen-containing aromatic (NCA) skeleton on the structure of DNA damaged through adduct formation at C8 of 2′-deoxyguanosine (dG), a common DNA lesion associated with chemical carcinogenesis. Specifically, density functional theory (DFT) calculations (B3LYP-D3) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (AMBER) are performed on seven model adducts with systematic expansion of the NCA moiety. DFT calculations reveal that the NCA moiety shape affects the structure at the nucleobase–carcinogen linkage. Approximately 4.5 μs of MD simulations on damaged oligonucleotides adopting three established conformational themes (namely, B, W, and S) illustrate that the structure and lesion-site stabilization strongly depend on the NCA moiety shape and size, which provides insight into the repair propensity of C8-dG adducted DNA. Our results add bulky moiety shape to the growing list of previously established effects on the conformational and repair outcomes of damaged DNA (i.e., size, ionization state, substitution, linker type, and DNA sequence). Furthermore, this work illustrates the utility of a systematic set of model DNA lesions for understanding the structure–activity relationship for DNA damaged by carcinogens of different sizes and shapes, which should be used in future studies of the cellular processing of damaged DNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207