Assessment of Carotid Artery Plaque Components With Machine Learning Classification Using Homodyned-K Parametric Maps and Elastograms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging methods, including elastography, echogenicity analysis, and speckle statistical modeling, are available from a single ultrasound (US) radio-frequency data acquisition. Since these US imaging methods provide complementary quantitative tissue information, characterization of carotid artery plaques may gain from their combination. Sixty-six patients with symptomatic ( n = 26 ) and asymptomatic ( n = 40 ) carotid atherosclerotic plaques were included in the study. Of these, 31 underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize plaque vulnerability and quantify plaque components. US radio-frequency data sequence acquisitions were performed on all patients and were used to compute noninvasive vascular US elastography and other QUS features. Additional QUS features were computed from three types of images: homodyned-K (HK) parametric maps, Nakagami parametric maps, and log-compressed B-mode images. The following six classification tasks were performed: detection of 1) a small area of lipid; 2) a large area of lipid; 3) a large area of calcification; 4) the presence of a ruptured fibrous cap; 5) differentiation of MRI-based classification of nonvulnerable carotid plaques from neovascularized or vulnerable ones; and 6) confirmation of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients. Feature selection was first applied to reduce the number of QUS parameters to a maximum of three per classification task. A random forest machine learning algorithm was then used to perform classifications. Areas under receiver-operating curves (AUCs) were computed with a bootstrap method. For all tasks, statistically significant higher AUCs were achieved with features based on elastography, HK parametric maps, and B-mode gray levels, when compared to elastography alone or other QUS alone ( ). For detection of a large area of lipid, the combination yielding the highest AUC (0.90, 95% CI 0.80-0.92, ) was based on elastography, HK, and B-mode gray-level features. To detect a large area of calcification, the highest AUC (0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96, ) was based on HK and B-mode gray level features. For other tasks, AUCs varied between 0.79 and 0.97. None of the best combinations contained Nakagami features. This study shows the added value of combining different features computed from a single US acquisition with machine learning to characterize carotid artery plaques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".