MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809699271 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.007

High Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Diabetic Men With Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis

2018· review· en· W2809699271 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisMedicineErectile dysfunctionInternal medicineOdds ratioObservational studyMEDLINEPublication biasDiabetes mellitusDemographyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) may be common among diabetic men with depressive symptoms (DS), but its prevalence is still debated. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis of the prevalence of ED in diabetic men with DS compared to those without DS, calculating the relative odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to January 2018. All the studies assessing the risk of ED among diabetic men having DS were reviewed. 2 Authors independently assessed literature and extracted information eligibility. Any disagreement was resolved by a third reviewer. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to evaluate study quality in meta-analyses. We calculated the ORs with 95% CIs using software Stata, Version 12.0; StataCorp, College Station, TX). Data were pooled using a fixed or random effects model according to heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess potential bias. This study was conducted according to the guidelines for Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies. OUTCOMES: The strength of the association between DS and the prevalence of ED was evaluated using ORs and 95% CIs. RESULTS: = 83.5%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Diabetic men with DS had a significantly increased prevalence of ED, suggesting that ED should be of concern to clinicians when managing diabetic men with DS. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A strength of this study is that it is the first meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of ED in diabetic men with DS and quantitatively analyze the association between DS and ED risk among diabetic men. A limitation is that all included studies were cross-sectional studies, which may generate bias. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis of 5 cross-sectional studies suggests that diabetic men showing DS, compared to the diabetic men without DS, have more risk of ED. Further larger prospective cohorts with more power or meta-analysis based on individual patient data need to be conducted to confirm this association. Wang X, Yang X, Cai Y, et al. High Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Diabetic Men With Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2018;15:935-941.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it