MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809713699 · doi:10.3382/ps/pey288

Fumigating broiler hatching eggs with lysozyme product (Inovapure) to reduce eggshell microbial load

2018· article· en· W2809713699 on OpenAlexaff
Xujie Li, Derek Anderson, Bruce Rathgeber, Nancy McLean, Janice MacIsaac

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersKimberly-Clark
KeywordsHatchingEggshellHand sanitizerInoculationBroilerFumigationAnimal scienceBiologyDistilled waterAgarFood scienceVeterinary medicineChemistryBacteriaHorticultureEcologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a lysozyme product (InovapureTM) (LP) against E. coli penetrating eggshells. In the first microbiological experiment, 60 agar-filled eggs were inoculated with E. coli suspension, then fumigated with distilled water, 1.5% or 3.0% LP or a quaternary ammonium product (QA) at 0.125% for 10 min. In the second microbiological experiment, another 60 agar-filled eggs were fumigated with the same sanitizer treatments first, then inoculated with the E. coli suspension. Eggshells were candled and visual colonies were counted after 48 h incubation. An animal experiment was conducted to evaluate LP applied to the surface of 2080 broiler hatching eggs on hatching and growth performance. Hatching eggs were submerged in an E. coli suspension. After drip drying, eggs were randomly divided into four fumigation treatments, each with four subsets of 150 eggs. Fumigation treatments were the same as in the microbiological experiments. Eggs were incubated in 8 incubators (2 replicate incubators per treatment) and the broilers were grown to 33 d of age. In the microbiological experiments, inoculated eggs fumigated with 3.0% LP and 0.125% QA reduced (P < 0.05) the total amount of E. coli to 11 cfu/egg and 10 cfu/egg, respectively. When eggs were sanitized prior to inoculation, 3.0% LP demonstrated (P < 0.05) ongoing bactericidal action to prevent E. coli penetration. No differences in hatchability, fertility rate or egg weight loss percent were found among sanitation treatments. At hatch, body weight or the ratio of yolk sac weight to yolk-free body weight were not affected by the sanitation treatments. However, the application of sanitizers decreased (P < 0.05) the presence of E. coli in the yolk sac of newly hatched chicks. Feed consumption, body weight and feed conversion ratio were not affected by sanitation treatments. However, average daily body weight gain was lower (P < 0.05) following QA. Overall, 3.0% LP demonstrated acceptable activity against E. coli on eggshells, and provided ongoing bactericidal action to prevent E. coli penetration without negatively affecting growth performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207