Seja Doce com os Bebês: avaliação de vídeo instrucional sobre manejo da dor neonatal por enfermeiros
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile of nurses who work in hospital units that care for newborns; to verify nurses' prior knowledge on breastfeeding, skin-to-skin care and sweet tasting solutions for neonatal procedural pain relief; and to evaluate nurses' perceptions on the feasibility, acceptability and usefulness of the Portuguese version of the "Be Sweet to Babies" video. METHOD: A cross-sectional study conducted in four units of a university affiliated hospital in São Paulo. Forty-five (45) nurses who answered the questionnaire and watched the video were included. Thirty-eight (38) nurses subsequently evaluated the video. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the variables, in addition to content analysis of the open question. RESULTS: Forty-five (45) nurses participated in the study; 97.4% were aware of the analgesic strategies, and after watching the video nurses reported that they intend to use or encourage the use of these strategies during painful procedures. All participants would recommend the video to other professionals, and considered the resource as useful, easy to understand and easy to apply in real situations. CONCLUSION: Nurses are aware of the analgesic strategies and they considered the video as a feasible, acceptable and useful tool for knowledge translation to health care providers, which can also favor parental involvement in their children's pain management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it