Exploitation of Stragglers in Coded Computation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cloud computing systems slow processing nodes, often referred to as “stragglers”, can significantly extend the computation time. Recent results have shown that error correction coding can be used to reduce the effect of stragglers. In this work we introduce a scheme that, in addition to using error correction to distribute mixed jobs across nodes, is also able to exploit the work completed by all nodes, including stragglers. We first consider vector-matrix multiplication and apply maximum distance separable (MDS) codes to small blocks of sub-matrices. The worker nodes process blocks sequentially, working block-by-block, transmitting partial per-block results to the master as they are completed. Sub-blocking allows a more continuous completion process, which thereby allows us to exploit the work of a much broader spectrum of processors and reduces computation time. We then apply this technique to matrix-matrix multiplication using product code. In this case, we show that the order of computing sub-tasks is a new degree of design freedom that can be exploited to reduce computation time further. We propose a novel approach to analyze the finishing time, which is different from typical order statistics. Simulation results show that the expected computation time decreases by a factor of at least two in compared to previous methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it