Exploitation of Stragglers in Coded Computation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cloud computing systems slow processing nodes, often referred to as “stragglers”, can significantly extend the computation time. Recent results have shown that error correction coding can be used to reduce the effect of stragglers. In this work we introduce a scheme that, in addition to using error correction to distribute mixed jobs across nodes, is also able to exploit the work completed by all nodes, including stragglers. We first consider vector-matrix multiplication and apply maximum distance separable (MDS) codes to small blocks of sub-matrices. The worker nodes process blocks sequentially, working block-by-block, transmitting partial per-block results to the master as they are completed. Sub-blocking allows a more continuous completion process, which thereby allows us to exploit the work of a much broader spectrum of processors and reduces computation time. We then apply this technique to matrix-matrix multiplication using product code. In this case, we show that the order of computing sub-tasks is a new degree of design freedom that can be exploited to reduce computation time further. We propose a novel approach to analyze the finishing time, which is different from typical order statistics. Simulation results show that the expected computation time decreases by a factor of at least two in compared to previous methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".