MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809746246 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.101

C.06 Somatotopic organization of the human spinothalamic tract: CT-guided mapping in awake patients undergoing cordotomy

2018· article· en· W2809746246 on OpenAlexaffvenue
CM Honey, Zurab Ivanishvili, CR Honey, MK Heran

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinothalamic tractCordotomyMedicineSpinal cordAnatomyRhizotomyNociceptionDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: After correlating in vivo macrostimulation-induced pain or temperature sensation during percutaneous cervical cordotomy with simultaneous CT imaging of the electrode tip location, we present a modern description of the somatotopy of the human cervical spinothalamic tract Methods: Twenty patients with medically refractory, unilateral, nociceptive pain due to malignancy received contralateral cervical percutaneous cordotomy. In a post-hoc analysis of the data, each individual’s cervical spinal cord was measured from the CT image using PACS software. The location of the electrode tip during each stimulation-induced response was then superimposed on a diagram of their cord Results: The lower limb responses were found more superficial and posterior to those of the upper limb. Interestingly, the region for upper limb responses surrounded that for lower limb primarily anteriorly and medially (deep) but also posteriorly Conclusions: This work simultaneously combined awake physiologic localization of fibers within the human -spinothalamic tract (STT) with neuroimaging documenting their precise anatomical localization within the spinal cord. The resultant map of the STT demonstrates, for the first time, that fibers from the lower limb are located superficially and posteriorly within the anterolateral spinal cord with the fibers from the upper limb surrounding them primarily deep and anteriorly but also posteriorly

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207