MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809831737 · doi:10.1109/codit.2018.8394922

Tricone bit health monitoring using wavelet packet decomposed vibration signal

2018· article· en· W2809831737 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hamed Rafezi, Ferri Hassani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVibrationComputer scienceWaveletSIGNAL (programming language)AccelerometerWavelet packet decompositionSignal processingTime–frequency analysisEngineeringWavelet transformArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringAcousticsRadarTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents part of a research work developing an automated bit failure prediction system for drilling applications. The approach relies on analysis of vibration signals generated as a result of bit-ground interactions. Extensive full-scale in-situ tests have been accomplished in participating Canadian mine sites. A high-frequency data acquisition unit was installed in the control cabin of a blasthole drill unit to collect the vibration signal from several accelerometers placed on different spots of the rig. The vibration signals collected from the drill mast were analyzed in time and frequency domains and the frequency pattern produced by worn bit is achieved. The frequency ranges of vibration signal those are affected by bit wear are investigated. An Artificial Intelligence (AI) classifier is being designed to perform the automated bit condition classification based on selected signal features. For this purpose, a time-frequency representation of the vibration signal is achieved by application of Wavelet Packet Decomposition (WPD). This research final outcomes will enable mining operations to improve drilling performance by detection of bit wear status and prediction of the bit catastrophic failure to avoid additional costs and delays for the production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207