Kekerasan Kemanusiaan dan Perampasan Tanah Pasca- 1965 di Banyuwangi, Jawa Timur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kebijakan Land reform di Banyuwangi era 1960-an berhasil meredistribusi tanah kelebihan maksimum, tanah absentee, dan tanah negara bekas perkebunan dan hutan. Pasca kudeta 1965 terjadi kekerasan kemanusiaan dan tindakan counter-Land reform oleh berbagai pihak. Didasarkan pada data-data utama dari kantor pertanahan dan dokumen militer Banyuwangi, artikel ini menunjukkan kaitan erat antara Land reform dengan korban pembunuhan yang menjadi sasaran pasca-1965. Artikel ini adalah usaha awal untuk membuka dimensi ekonomi-politik terhadap massacre pasca-1965. Sejarah agraria dan kekerasan kemanusiaan dalam artikel ini dibaca melalui konsep “primitive accumulation”, dalam argumen bahwa kekerasan kemanusiaan berupa pengusiran, perampasan tanah dan pembunuhan terhadap petani adalah tonggak baru dan bagian integral dari pembangunan politik dan ekonomi agraria Orde Baru berikutnya. Jika massacre adalah making die, pembunuhan dalam arti literal, maka proses yang terjadi setelahnya adalah letting die, berupa tercerabutnya mereka dari sistem produksi (tanah) dan kewarganegaraannya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".