MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809844339 · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/aad0b1

Rolled-up SiO <sub> <i>x</i> </sub> /SiN <sub> <i>x</i> </sub> microtubes with an enhanced quality factor for sensitive solvent sensing

2018· article· en· W2809844339 on OpenAlexafffund
Pengfei Song, Cheng Chen, Juntian Qu, Pengfei Ou, Hadi Tavakoli Dastjerdi, Zetian Mi, Jun Song, Xinyu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueNanotechnology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMaterials scienceRefractive indexPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionSolventBilayerNanotechnologyChemical vapor depositionOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The microtubes made through rolling-up of strain-engineered nanomembranes have received growing research attention after their first invention due to the technology’s high flexibility, integrability, and versatility. These rolled-up microtubes have been used for a variety of device applications including sensors, batteries and transistors, among others. This paper reports the development of highly sensitive whispering-gallery mode (WGM) chemical sensors based on rolled-up microtube optical microcavities (RUM-OCs). For the first time, such microcavities were batch fabricated through rolling-up of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD)-synthesized SiO x /SiN x bilayer nanomembranes, which have better optical properties than the conventional electron-beam-deposited SiO/SiO 2 bilayers. Benefiting from the high refractive index (RI) of PECVD-deposited SiN x , our RUM-OC shows an enhanced quality factor of 880 that is much higher than that (50) of a SiO/SiO 2 RUM-OC with the same dimensions. The developed RUM-OC is used for sensitive WGM solvent sensing, and demonstrate a limit of detection of 10 −4 refractive index unit (RIU), which is 10 times lower than that (10 −3 RIU) of a SiO/SiO 2 RUM-OC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanotechnologySame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207