Association between sex hormones and ambulatory blood pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Higher levels of total testosterone and lower levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) have been associated with increased blood pressure (BP) in women with an inverse association between total testosterone and BP among men. Fewer studies have examined associations with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), blunted nocturnal BP decline or the role of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), a precursor to androgens. METHODS: Baseline blood samples were assayed for 229 normotensive men (≥50 years) and women (≥55 years) participating in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL. Standardized seated BP (SBP and DBP) and 24-h ABP were measured by trained technicians. Self-reported cardiovascular risk factors and sociodemographic variables were reported on baseline questionnaires. Sex stratified linear regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking and alcohol estimated the association between each sex hormone and measures of BP and 24-h ABP. Logistic regression used to estimate associations with blunted nocturnal decline (>10% reduction in SBP or DBP during sleeping hours). RESULTS: Total testosterone and SHBG demonstrated significant inverse correlations with SBP whereas DHEAS was not significantly associated with BP. Among men, in multivariable analyses, each 10% increase in DHEAS was associated with a 0.41 mmHg higher seated DBP (β = 4.29, 95% CI 0.84-7.73) and each 10% increase in total testosterone and SHBG was associated with a 0.54 mmHg (β = -5.65, 95% CI -10.45 to -0.84) and 0.60 mmHg (β = -6.30, 95% CI -11.38 to -1.21) decrease in seated DBP, respectively. No significant associations were observed among women. CONCLUSION: Among men only, we observed statistically significant inverse cross-sectional associations between total testosterone and SHBG with seated DBP, and a significant positive association with DHEAS levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".