MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809931234 · doi:10.3390/rs10071039

A Level Set Method for Infrared Image Segmentation Using Global and Local Information

2018· article· en· W2809931234 on OpenAlexaff
Minjie Wan, Guohua Gu, Jianhong Sun, Weixian Qian, Kan Ren, Qian Chen, Xavier Maldague

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersState Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching TechnologyChina Scholarship CouncilBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLevel set (data structures)Computer scienceLevel set methodArtificial intelligenceInitializationComputer visionSigned distance functionRobustness (evolution)Image segmentationActive contour modelPixelSegmentationPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared image segmentation plays a significant role in many burgeoning applications of remote sensing, such as environmental monitoring, traffic surveillance, air navigation and so on. However, the precision is limited due to the blurred edge, low contrast and intensity inhomogeneity caused by infrared imaging. To overcome these challenges, a level set method using global and local information is proposed in this paper. In our method, a hybrid signed pressure function is constructed by fusing a global term and a local term adaptively. The global term is represented by the global average intensity, which effectively accelerates the evolution when the evolving curve is far away from the object. The local term is represented by a multi-feature-based signed driving force, which accurately guides the curve to approach the real boundary when it is near the object. Then, the two terms are integrated via an adaptive weight matrix calculated based on the range value of each pixel. Under the framework of geodesic active contour model, a new level set formula is obtained by substituting the proposed signed pressure function for the edge stopping function. In addition, a Gaussian convolution is applied to regularize the level set function for the purpose of avoiding the computationally expensive re-initialization. By iteration, the object of interest can be segmented when the level set function converges. Both qualitative and quantitative experiments verify that our method outperforms other state-of-the-art level set methods in terms of accuracy and robustness with the initial contour being set randomly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207