MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809944254

Terre d'accueil

2011· book· fr· W2809944254 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Théâtre De La Vieille

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Editions L'Interligne eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une creation collective du Theâtre de la Vieille 17 Terre d'accueil est l'aboutissement d'un projet d'animation theâtrale du Theâtre de la Vieille 17. Cette piece, elaboree a partir des experiences d'une trentaine d'immigrants francophones, presente le quotidien de six nouveaux arrivants a differentes etapes de leur adaptation au Canada. Pour creer le texte, les auteures Esther Beauchemin et Michele Matteau ont recueilli les impressions et les preoccupations des participants, les encourageant a livrer librement leurs sentiments lors de seances d'improvisation. Terre d'accueil nous incite a prendre conscience des difficultes rencontrees par les nouveaux arrivants dans leur pays d'adoption. Oscillant entre la voix poetique et le ton realiste, entre le rire et les larmes, cette ?uvre traduit les deceptions comme les joies intenses que vivent ces gens venus a la recherche d'une vie meilleure. Elle ouvre un espace de communion, dans l'espoir de rendre notre monde plus humain et plus sensible aux problematiques quotidiennes de ceux que nous recevons. Avec la participation de: Francine Anne Mercier, Yanick Dutelly, Jean-Pierre Nzeyimana, Marianne Bichara, Rose Teclaire Albertine Ekosso, Huguette Jean-Francois, Georges Seraphin, Elise Berthiaume, Veronique Rene, Rose Guerline Rene, Katiana Rene, Louis Mbani Antagana, Michel Shamoko-Tugena et Evalt Lemours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Editions L'Interligne eBooksSame topicMigration and Exile StudiesFrench-language works237,207