MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810031807 · doi:10.1109/ispsd.2018.8393597

Investigation of threshold voltage stability of SiC MOSFETs

2018· article· en· W2810031807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSilicon carbideThreshold voltageReliability (semiconductor)OptoelectronicsNegative-bias temperature instabilityMOSFETTransistorVoltageHysteresisElectronic engineeringEngineering physicsElectrical engineeringCondensed matter physicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon carbide (SiC) based metal-oxide semiconductor-field-effect-transistors (MOSFETs) show excellent switching performance and reliability. However, compared to silicon devices the more complex properties of the semiconductor-dielectric interface imply some natural peculiarities in threshold voltage variation. This paper analyzes threshold voltage hysteresis effects, bias temperature instability effects (BTI) and their relevance for the switching behavior. Most of the effects can be understood by means of simple physical models and do not harm reliability and performance of the device. It turns out that the standard norm test and readout procedures typically used to characterize threshold voltage and threshold voltage drifts for Si devices are insufficient and need to be adapted for SiC MOSFETs in order to get reproducible and solid results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it