Experimental Study and Numerical Investigation of the Phenomena Occurring During Long Duration Cold Spray Deposition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low Pressure Cold Spray process is a relatively new additive technique allowing to create high quality metallic coatings, through the high velocity spraying of particles, on both metallic and non-metallic substrates. The adhesion mechanism of the particles is, to date, not fully understood and the phenomena occurring during long depositions (which are the more interesting for industrial processes) are not known and studied in details. Aiming to fulfill this lack of knowledge, the phenomena occurring during long deposition were studied through both careful experimental evaluations and numerical approach. Particular attention was paid at the working conditions of the De Laval nozzle system which accelerates the particles, a computational fluid dynamics model focusing on both geometrical features and spray behavior was proposed. Micron-sized aluminum powders and compressed air as carrier gas were used in this experimentation, numerical simulations are performed to predict the gas flow regime. It has been found that the deposition efficiency tends to decrease due to the critical phenomena occur into the spray nozzle during long time depositions. The sprayed particles tend to stick to the walls of the nozzle and, moreover, shock waves occur inside the nozzle further promoting the particles stick phenomena, making the system inefficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it