MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810114378 · doi:10.1063/1.5030863

Geometry of Calogero-Moser systems

2018· article· en· W2810114378 on OpenAlexaff
Indranil Biswas, Jacques Hurtubise

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrable systemModuli spaceTrigonometryMathematicsContext (archaeology)Abelian groupElliptic curveAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsVariety (cybernetics)Interpretation (philosophy)Abelian varietyRealization (probability)GeometryMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elliptic Calogero-Moser integrable system for an arbitrary root system has a realization as a moduli space of Higgs bundles over an Abelian variety associated with the elliptic curve and with the root system. This paper examines the Fourier-Mukai transform of this, giving an interpretation of the system on a network of elliptic curves. The rational and trigonometric versions of the systems are briefly discussed, and it is shown how they enter as degenerations in this geometric context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207